40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.53%
Revenue growth above 20% – Exceptional top-line expansion. Warren Buffett would check if rising costs (e.g., SG&A) are still under control, ensuring profits grow alongside sales.
68.72%
Gross profit growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would verify if increasing margins accompany rising gross profit, not just revenue volume.
6650.00%
EBIT growth above 20% – Outstanding expansion in core profitability. Warren Buffett would confirm if operating margins also improve, not just top-line growth.
6650.00%
Operating income growth above 20% – Elite operational improvement. Warren Buffett would check if margin expansion accompanies this growth.
-177.89%
Negative net income growth shows profitability erosion. Benjamin Graham would worry about solvency and longer-term viability.
-178.67%
Negative EPS growth underscores deteriorating earnings per share. Benjamin Graham would worry about ongoing dilution or weakened profitability.
-178.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth suggests diluted shares grew or net income fell. Benjamin Graham would see this as a serious setback to shareholder value.
-0.04%
Share count shrinking more than 10% – Aggressive buybacks. Warren Buffett typically welcomes this if undervalued, but watch debt usage for repurchases.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Dividend growth 0-2% – Barely rising. Howard Marks might question if the firm should allocate capital elsewhere.
3.36%
OCF growth 0-5% – Minimal gain. Howard Marks would be cautious about the company’s ability to fund large projects or dividends.
-20.69%
Negative FCF growth reveals potential liquidity pressures or large capex overshadowing cash generation. Benjamin Graham would demand deeper scrutiny.
-83.97%
A negative 10Y CAGR in revenue/share implies a decade of top-line decline per share. Benjamin Graham would be extremely cautious about long-term viability.
-42.93%
Negative 5Y CAGR implies mid-term contraction. Benjamin Graham would be very cautious unless a turnaround story is evident.
-59.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR signals recent top-line contraction per share. Benjamin Graham would be skeptical unless a turnaround is clear.
-86.82%
A negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR signals erosion in long-term cash generation. Benjamin Graham would label this as a major red flag.
-61.04%
A negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR indicates declining cash generation per share mid-term. Benjamin Graham would see this as a red flag unless explained by short-term strategic investments.
7.72%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 5-10% – Decent. Seth Klarman would check if it’s consistent or just boosted by a single year.
-116.27%
A negative 10Y net income/share CAGR reflects a decade of weakening profits. Benjamin Graham would be extremely cautious unless a turnaround is evident.
-116.68%
A negative 5Y net income/share CAGR reveals a mid-term deterioration in bottom-line earnings. Benjamin Graham would be cautious unless a credible turnaround is visible.
-188.12%
Negative 3Y net income/share CAGR highlights recent bottom-line decay. Benjamin Graham would want clarity on cost vs. revenue drivers for the declines.
-75.09%
Negative 10Y equity/share CAGR indicates a long-term decline in book value. Benjamin Graham would be extremely cautious about net worth destruction.
-3.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share CAGR suggests net worth destruction. Benjamin Graham would see if failing profitability or large payouts cause it.
-47.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share CAGR means a near-term drop in book value. Benjamin Graham would be cautious unless restructured operations promise a future rebound.
-92.82%
A negative 10Y dividend/share CAGR indicates cuts over a decade. Benjamin Graham sees a possible red flag unless reinvestment for growth justifies smaller payouts.
-92.79%
A negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR indicates cuts or stagnation. Benjamin Graham would see it as a warning unless the firm redirected funds to more profitable growth.
-78.67%
A negative 3Y dividend/share CAGR suggests recent cuts. Benjamin Graham confirms if a short-term profit dip or strategic pivot caused them.
-41.02%
Negative receivables growth can be good if demand remains stable. Benjamin Graham verifies it isn’t from a collapse in sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.68%
Asset growth 0-5% – Minimal. Howard Marks notes the firm may be optimizing existing assets or being cautious with expansions.
-3.36%
Falling book value/share indicates net losses, large dividends, or intangible impairments. Benjamin Graham warns unless there’s a strategic reason.
0.84%
Debt rising up to 5% yoy – Mild increase. Peter Lynch sees expansions or acquisitions possibly justifying modest new debt.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.18%
SG&A growth 10-15% – Potential overhead buildup. Howard Marks questions if margins shrink unless revenue scales accordingly.