PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-153.78%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 13.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.32%
Negative yoy D&A while OGI.TO is 34.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
198.53%
Well above OGI.TO's 27.33% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-49.49%
Negative yoy SBC while OGI.TO is 542.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-34.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OGI.TO at -612.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84825.99%
Negative yoy while OGI.TO is 275.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-100.98%
Negative yoy CFO while OGI.TO is 48.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -105.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
214.58%
Acquisition growth of 214.58% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-23.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-53.91%
We reduce yoy sales while OGI.TO is 59.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1612.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -97.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-47.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -63.80%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
7.64%
We repay more while OGI.TO is negative at -795.95%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
39.77%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. OGI.TO's 100.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.