1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
686.38%
Net income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 31.06%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
40.15%
Some D&A expansion while OGI.TO is negative at -5.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-25.81%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OGI.TO stands at 25.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
310.60%
SBC growth while OGI.TO is negative at -47.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-602.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while OGI.TO is 119.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-138.18%
AR is negative yoy while OGI.TO is 226.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-144.96%
Negative yoy inventory while OGI.TO is 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with OGI.TO at -78.16%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-19.42%
Negative yoy usage while OGI.TO is 43.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-330.67%
Both negative yoy, with OGI.TO at -138.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-12852.71%
Negative yoy CFO while OGI.TO is 93.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
18.60%
CapEx growth well above OGI.TO's 25.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
649.13%
Acquisition growth of 649.13% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
87.28%
Purchases growth of 87.28% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.93%
We have some liquidation growth while OGI.TO is negative at -12.83%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-973.07%
We reduce yoy other investing while OGI.TO is 7701.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
62.56%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. OGI.TO's 179.17%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-43.37%
We cut debt repayment yoy while OGI.TO is 85.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while OGI.TO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.