1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-140.19%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 596.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
153.97%
D&A growth well above OGI.TO's 65.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-220.74%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
17.45%
Less SBC growth vs. OGI.TO's 70.91%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-240.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OGI.TO at -1.24%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
203.29%
AR growth well above OGI.TO's 73.84%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-283.24%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with OGI.TO at -55.11%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
85.52%
AP growth well above OGI.TO's 149.97%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-428.87%
Negative yoy usage while OGI.TO is 1496.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
79.99%
Some yoy increase while OGI.TO is negative at -257.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-4001.79%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with OGI.TO at -3.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.72%
Some CapEx rise while OGI.TO is negative at -24.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1345.94%
Negative yoy acquisition while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
85.54%
Purchases growth of 85.54% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
382.44%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 17144.33%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-33.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -15338.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
61.38%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. OGI.TO's 348.66%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-2757.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -17.40%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while OGI.TO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.