1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.34%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 96.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
13.90%
D&A growth well above OGI.TO's 4.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
311.60%
Well above OGI.TO's 103.21% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
107.88%
SBC growth while OGI.TO is negative at -30.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-42.22%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OGI.TO at -384.31%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-110.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with OGI.TO at -357.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-90.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with OGI.TO at -410.76%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
88.89%
A yoy AP increase while OGI.TO is negative at -248.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
224.56%
Growth well above OGI.TO's 205.90%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-38.45%
Negative yoy while OGI.TO is 241.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-73.67%
Negative yoy CFO while OGI.TO is 13.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-2.03%
Negative yoy CapEx while OGI.TO is 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-736193.53%
Negative yoy acquisition while OGI.TO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-90.37%
Both yoy lines are negative, with OGI.TO at -99.68%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-83.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -372.20%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-414.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -551.82%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
26.28%
We repay more while OGI.TO is negative at -4166.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.