1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1840.05%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with OGI.TO at -2750.57%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.35%
D&A growth well above OGI.TO's 1.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-20.81%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-12.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with OGI.TO at -1.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-164.27%
Negative yoy working capital usage while OGI.TO is 154.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
16.45%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. OGI.TO's 81.10%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-419.33%
Negative yoy inventory while OGI.TO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-88.44%
Negative yoy AP while OGI.TO is 207.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-191.93%
Negative yoy usage while OGI.TO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
8421.81%
Well above OGI.TO's 5890.57%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-163.79%
Negative yoy CFO while OGI.TO is 72.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
81.11%
Some CapEx rise while OGI.TO is negative at -64.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
84.61%
Some acquisitions while OGI.TO is negative at -721.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
99.61%
Some yoy expansion while OGI.TO is negative at -13312.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.85%
We reduce yoy other investing while OGI.TO is 247.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
98.31%
We have mild expansions while OGI.TO is negative at -129.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
90.30%
Debt repayment above 1.5x OGI.TO's 17.84%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
117.55%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. OGI.TO's 300.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-117.55%
We cut yoy buybacks while OGI.TO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.