PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.81%
Negative EBIT growth while ACB.TO is at 28.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-49.81%
Negative operating income growth while ACB.TO is at 24.81%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-52.65%
Negative net income growth while ACB.TO stands at 24.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-52.63%
Negative EPS growth while ACB.TO is at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-52.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ACB.TO is at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.38%
Share reduction while ACB.TO is at 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.38%
Reduced diluted shares while ACB.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.85%
OCF growth above 1.5x ACB.TO's 31.80%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
71.85%
FCF growth above 1.5x ACB.TO's 31.80%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.97%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.97%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.97%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
14.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
14.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
14.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-49.46%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-49.46%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-49.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.23%
AR growth well above ACB.TO's 31.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.03%
Positive asset growth while ACB.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-5.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.82%
We expand SG&A while ACB.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.