PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.84%
EBIT growth 50-75% of ACB.TO's 53.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
34.84%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of ACB.TO's 53.62%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
34.95%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ACB.TO's 54.27%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
34.48%
EPS growth at 50-75% of ACB.TO's 53.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
34.48%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of ACB.TO's 53.64%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.38%
Share count expansion well above ACB.TO's 0.74%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above ACB.TO's 0.74%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1204.92%
Negative OCF growth while ACB.TO is at 6.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1204.92%
Negative FCF growth while ACB.TO is at 6.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.69%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
70.69%
Positive OCF/share growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
70.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
85.51%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ACB.TO's 67.93%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
85.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ACB.TO's 67.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
85.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-39.50%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-39.50%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-39.50%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.18%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.36%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.85%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.