PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.93%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-33.93%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-34.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.96%
OCF growth under 50% of ACB.TO's 139.47%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
57.96%
FCF growth under 50% of ACB.TO's 139.47%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.43%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ACB.TO stands at 136.67%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-44.43%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ACB.TO is at 158.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-44.43%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ACB.TO stands at 126.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-265.20%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-265.20%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-265.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ACB.TO is 58.30%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-54.37%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-54.37%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-54.37%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.76%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. ACB.TO's 50.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.79%
Positive asset growth while ACB.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-27.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.93%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ACB.TO's 146.76%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.