PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.87%
Revenue growth under 50% of ACB.TO's 456.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
67.35%
Positive gross profit growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1734.07%
Positive EBIT growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1734.07%
Positive operating income growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-29.67%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-43.13%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-35.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
412.48%
OCF growth above 1.5x ACB.TO's 46.98%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-1793.46%
Negative FCF growth while ACB.TO is at 49.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1010.27%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1010.27%
Positive OCF/share growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
34659.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
390.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
390.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
631.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
795.87%
Positive growth while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
795.87%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
993.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ACB.TO's 1.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.78%
AR growth well above ACB.TO's 0.75%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
30.20%
We show growth while ACB.TO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
126.50%
Positive asset growth while ACB.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
105.08%
Positive BV/share change while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2902.62%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ACB.TO's 129.30%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
19.50%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ACB.TO's 69.41%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.