PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.63%
Positive EBIT growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
72.63%
Positive operating income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
73.70%
Positive net income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
80.46%
Positive EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
80.46%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
33.82%
Slight or no buybacks while OGI.TO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
33.82%
Slight or no buyback while OGI.TO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.18%
Positive OCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
94.18%
Positive FCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 21.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.88%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-31.47%
We have a declining book value while OGI.TO shows 247.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.63%
We cut SG&A while OGI.TO invests at 39.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.