1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 94.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
34.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 94.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
34.95%
Net income growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 94.95%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
34.48%
EPS growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 98.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
34.48%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 98.59%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.38%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 300.12%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 300.12%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1204.92%
Negative OCF growth while OGI.TO is at 49.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1204.92%
Negative FCF growth while OGI.TO is at 84.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with OGI.TO's 77.87%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
70.69%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to OGI.TO's 77.87%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
70.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to OGI.TO's 77.87%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
85.51%
Similar net income/share CAGR to OGI.TO's 93.18%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
85.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to OGI.TO's 93.18%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
85.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to OGI.TO's 93.18%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-39.50%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-39.50%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-39.50%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.18%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 30.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.36%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.85%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.