1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.81%
Positive EBIT growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
41.81%
Positive operating income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
45.90%
Net income growth at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 91.60%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
47.62%
EPS growth at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 91.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
47.62%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 91.56%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4156.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-4156.92%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-103.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-103.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-103.85%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
83.46%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 83.46% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
83.46%
Net income/share CAGR of 83.46% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
83.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 83.46% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-57.10%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-57.10%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OGI.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-57.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OGI.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.34%
AR growth well above OGI.TO's 23.74%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.01%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.81%
We cut SG&A while OGI.TO invests at 18.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.