1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.05%
EBIT growth 75-90% of OGI.TO's 25.92%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
22.05%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 25.92%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
22.04%
Net income growth comparable to OGI.TO's 22.43%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
21.74%
EPS growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 24.77%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
21.74%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 24.77%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.50%
OCF growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 108.15%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
93.50%
FCF growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 52.56%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.50%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-102.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-102.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 121.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
73.12%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 73.12% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
73.12%
Net income/share CAGR of 73.12% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
73.12%
Positive short-term CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-79.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-79.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OGI.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-79.29%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OGI.TO is at 140.57%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.53%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.43%
Negative asset growth while OGI.TO invests at 17.63%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-9.38%
We have a declining book value while OGI.TO shows 8.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.04%
SG&A growth well above OGI.TO's 12.95%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.