PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.38%
Revenue growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 11.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
44.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 211.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
143.07%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.64%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
143.07%
Operating income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-154.14%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 13.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-148.34%
Negative EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 79.03%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-145.86%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 79.03%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
23.88%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 313.16%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
23.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 313.16%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.98%
Negative OCF growth while OGI.TO is at 48.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-48.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
82.29%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 70.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
87.74%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 73.29%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-240.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-240.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is 33.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
6.64%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 78.47%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1674.77%
Equity/share CAGR of 1674.77% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1674.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 309.57%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
3789.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.85%
Our AR growth while OGI.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
43.35%
Inventory growth well above OGI.TO's 20.21%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
52.48%
Asset growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 3.84%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
14.24%
Positive BV/share change while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
272.38%
We have some new debt while OGI.TO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-50.01%
Our R&D shrinks while OGI.TO invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-24.57%
We cut SG&A while OGI.TO invests at 77.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.