PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
242.97%
Positive revenue growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
191.95%
Positive gross profit growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-318.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-318.21%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-299.52%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-295.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-295.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.15%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 15.25%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.34%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.36%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1249.62%
Negative OCF growth while OGI.TO is at 139.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-27.33%
Negative FCF growth while OGI.TO is at 30.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28238.49%
5Y CAGR of 28238.49% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
545.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 415.88%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
-187.04%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 977.78%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-89.89%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 11702.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-395.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 203.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1405.06%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-592.17%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1081.80%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4146.76%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 16025.49%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
2334.22%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 304045.91%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
298.88%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 985.79%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.94%
Our AR growth while OGI.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
115.87%
We show growth while OGI.TO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.21%
Negative asset growth while OGI.TO invests at 13.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.72%
We have a declining book value while OGI.TO shows 5.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
41.69%
We have some new debt while OGI.TO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-63.20%
Our R&D shrinks while OGI.TO invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
90.27%
SG&A growth well above OGI.TO's 11.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.