PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
65.60%
Positive revenue growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
109.55%
Positive gross profit growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
77.73%
Positive EBIT growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
77.73%
Positive operating income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
115.00%
Positive net income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
115.13%
EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 48.15%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
114.87%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 46.15%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.41%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 317.29%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 306.50%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.93%
Positive OCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
21.35%
Positive FCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1088.27%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 385.61%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-5491.93%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-3771.73%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1815.90%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1243.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
413.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
272.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
5974.97%
Equity/share CAGR of 5974.97% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13212.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1278.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 310.97%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.87%
Our AR growth while OGI.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.14%
We show growth while OGI.TO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
15.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 0.13%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-2.05%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
513.53%
Debt growth far above OGI.TO's 0.22%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
14.17%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. OGI.TO's 7.69%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-22.82%
We cut SG&A while OGI.TO invests at 45.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.