PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.78%
Positive revenue growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
49.59%
Positive gross profit growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
190.40%
Positive EBIT growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
190.40%
Positive operating income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
171.27%
Positive net income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
162.90%
Positive EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
162.90%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.26%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 6.36%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
2.43%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 6.88%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.58%
Negative OCF growth while OGI.TO is at 178.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-32.85%
Negative FCF growth while OGI.TO is at 64.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1211.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 2268.58%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
736.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 443.48%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-600.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 2229.65%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-3629.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 537.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-19942.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 309.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
175.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
37300.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-73.74%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4319.20%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 13006.91%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1522.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 1144.44%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
48.90%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 125.37%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Our AR growth while OGI.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
47.19%
We show growth while OGI.TO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.70%
Positive asset growth while OGI.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.02%
Positive BV/share change while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.80%
We’re deleveraging while OGI.TO stands at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.80%
We increase R&D while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
0.20%
We expand SG&A while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.