1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.79%
Positive revenue growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
66.19%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 42.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
131.77%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 33.35%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
131.77%
Operating income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 33.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
94.53%
Net income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 11.02%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
94.63%
EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 15.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
94.63%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 13.92%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.77%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 4.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.77%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 4.46%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1372.80%
Negative OCF growth while OGI.TO is at 101.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-213.23%
Negative FCF growth while OGI.TO is at 90.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2699.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 393.86%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
995.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 264.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-10471.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1899.91%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 112.34%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-745.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 284.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-322.72%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-96.58%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-115.70%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5649.27%
Equity/share CAGR of 5649.27% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
2476.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 675.14%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
188.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 86.66%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.57%
Our AR growth while OGI.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
37.86%
We show growth while OGI.TO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.69%
Asset growth well under 50% of OGI.TO's 13.35%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.89%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 1.82%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
8.09%
Debt growth far above OGI.TO's 14.83%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-72.57%
Our R&D shrinks while OGI.TO invests at 69.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
8.97%
We expand SG&A while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.