PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.79%
Positive revenue growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-46.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-309.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-309.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2284.85%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2260.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2260.25%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.61%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 15.16%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.61%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.50%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.19%
Positive OCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
80.26%
Positive FCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
946.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 148.53%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
538.59%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 107.30%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-84.89%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
65.84%
Positive OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
261.74%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-5501.82%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-4443.43%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-289.78%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3122.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 3122.11% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
403.50%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-8.22%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 487.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.73%
We show growth while OGI.TO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.71%
Positive asset growth while OGI.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.38%
Positive BV/share change while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
29.90%
We have some new debt while OGI.TO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
88.66%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. OGI.TO's 25.36%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
18.88%
SG&A growth well above OGI.TO's 3.31%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.