1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.48%
Negative revenue growth while OGI.TO stands at 38.80%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.23%
Negative gross profit growth while OGI.TO is at 112.32%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-61.11%
Negative EBIT growth while OGI.TO is at 58.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-61.11%
Negative operating income growth while OGI.TO is at 58.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-205.02%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 93.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-181.58%
Negative EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 95.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-181.58%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 95.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
9.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 23.05%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
9.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 23.70%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.79%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
65.09%
Positive FCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
998.76%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 121.61%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
70.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 137.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
99.10%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-100.92%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
99.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 35.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-3992.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-2769.45%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-171.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3001.42%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 12518.76%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
191.30%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 749.67%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-26.97%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OGI.TO is at 32.89%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.91%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-0.89%
Inventory is declining while OGI.TO stands at 7.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.70%
Asset growth well under 50% of OGI.TO's 46.83%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-24.79%
We have a declining book value while OGI.TO shows 53.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
72.83%
Debt growth far above OGI.TO's 48.69%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-42.29%
Our R&D shrinks while OGI.TO invests at 13.23%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
39.21%
SG&A growth well above OGI.TO's 19.22%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.