1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.13%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 22.17%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
126.49%
Positive gross profit growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.01%
EBIT growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 37.96%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.01%
Operating income growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 37.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-223.94%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 94.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-151.50%
Negative EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 81.52%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-151.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 81.18%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.66%
Slight or no buybacks while OGI.TO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.66%
Slight or no buyback while OGI.TO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1622.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-40695.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
591.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 262.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
590.91%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-9912.68%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1199.97%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-255.95%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 75.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-2334.26%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-938.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is 53.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-207.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
9571.99%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 3185.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
979.62%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 155.98%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
63.77%
Positive short-term equity growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.86%
AR growth well above OGI.TO's 21.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.92%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.65%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.43%
We have a declining book value while OGI.TO shows 269.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-6.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
119.27%
We increase R&D while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
34.23%
SG&A growth well above OGI.TO's 0.06%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.