PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.12%
Negative revenue growth while OGI.TO stands at 19.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
21.56%
Positive gross profit growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
123.81%
Positive EBIT growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
123.81%
Positive operating income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
645.04%
Net income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 31.13%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
22200.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 30.77%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
22200.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 30.77%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
5.52%
Slight or no buybacks while OGI.TO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
6.15%
Slight or no buyback while OGI.TO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-170.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-106.82%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
656.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 62.01%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-267.86%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-478.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 77.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-28.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
440.92%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
122.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 90.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
122.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 96.70%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
6526.78%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 2850.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
522.42%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
56.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OGI.TO's 43.25%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
17.28%
Inventory growth well above OGI.TO's 7.82%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.97%
Positive asset growth while OGI.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.25%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-8.37%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-68.16%
Our R&D shrinks while OGI.TO invests at 15.96%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
19.59%
SG&A growth well above OGI.TO's 24.46%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.