PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.96%
Revenue growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 19.32%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-116.90%
Negative gross profit growth while OGI.TO is at 86.44%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1962.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 46.58%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1962.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 46.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-1159.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1118.10%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1118.10%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.74%
Share change of 4.74% while OGI.TO is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
4.12%
Diluted share change of 4.12% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.76%
Positive OCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
48.79%
Positive FCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
773.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 613.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-31.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 40.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-3473.12%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-20076.82%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
36.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to OGI.TO's 37.08%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-17455.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 32.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-5049.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1634.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO is 86.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
8676.79%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 743.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
394.53%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 106.06%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
44.47%
Positive short-term equity growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.62%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OGI.TO's 33.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-10.16%
Inventory is declining while OGI.TO stands at 12.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.35%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.02%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-14.88%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-67.07%
Our R&D shrinks while OGI.TO invests at 74.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.79%
We expand SG&A while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.