PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.07%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
822.03%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 67.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-112.41%
Negative EBIT growth while OGI.TO is at 164.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-112.41%
Negative operating income growth while OGI.TO is at 164.46%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
85.63%
Net income growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 186.74%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
86.67%
EPS growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 442.93%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
87.78%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 402.02%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
11.12%
Slight or no buybacks while OGI.TO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
13.10%
Slight or no buyback while OGI.TO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.44%
Negative OCF growth while OGI.TO is at 117.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-88.64%
Negative FCF growth while OGI.TO is at 86.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
549.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 426.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-39.53%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-3850.87%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 326.96%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-216.02%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 1499.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
25.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OGI.TO's 112.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-2957.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 155.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-213.57%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is 224.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-299.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO is 407.39%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
7956.19%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 4087.66%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
304.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 94.27%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
30.41%
Positive short-term equity growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.22%
Our AR growth while OGI.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-0.36%
Inventory is declining while OGI.TO stands at 27.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.62%
Positive asset growth while OGI.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.54%
We have a declining book value while OGI.TO shows 302.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.45%
We have some new debt while OGI.TO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
207.41%
We increase R&D while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-7.22%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.