PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.51%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 40.43%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
674.09%
Positive gross profit growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
92.54%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 82.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
92.54%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 82.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
89.98%
Net income growth comparable to OGI.TO's 84.54%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
90.72%
EPS growth similar to OGI.TO's 84.53%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
90.72%
Similar diluted EPS growth to OGI.TO's 84.53%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
6.68%
Share count expansion well above OGI.TO's 0.83%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.68%
Diluted share count expanding well above OGI.TO's 0.83%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.00%
Positive OCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
260.05%
Positive FCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
480.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OGI.TO's 3015.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-38.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 34.41%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1711.87%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
360.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
543.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 66.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-16516.68%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-737.15%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
38.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of OGI.TO's 49.08%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
5797.52%
Positive growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
5.79%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 131.69%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-7.21%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.06%
Our AR growth while OGI.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.11%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.57%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.25%
We’re deleveraging while OGI.TO stands at 2521.67%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.26%
R&D dropping or stable vs. OGI.TO's 15.71%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
22.38%
SG&A growth well above OGI.TO's 20.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.