PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.80%
Negative revenue growth while OGI.TO stands at 9.12%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-41.28%
Negative gross profit growth while OGI.TO is at 1642.73%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
20.03%
EBIT growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 79.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
20.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 79.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-89.15%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 110.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-78.84%
Negative EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 109.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-78.84%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is at 108.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.24%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.24%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OGI.TO's 18.89%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.13%
OCF growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 54.86%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
28.93%
FCF growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 44.95%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.49%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-45.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 38.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-449.35%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 19.75%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
71.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-9039.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 76.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-781.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 199.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
68.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 109.93%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
88.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of OGI.TO's 148.21%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
7068.67%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 383.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-27.08%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-0.15%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.16%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 15.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-3.39%
Inventory is declining while OGI.TO stands at 0.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while OGI.TO invests at 6.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.57%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.02%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
89.29%
We increase R&D while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
1.66%
We expand SG&A while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.