PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.06%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 8.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
127.38%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 22.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
38.32%
EBIT growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 105.61%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
38.32%
Operating income growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 105.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
65.75%
Positive net income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
66.67%
Positive EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
66.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
5.20%
Share change of 5.20% while OGI.TO is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
5.20%
Diluted share change of 5.20% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
293.60%
OCF growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 338.42%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
184.22%
FCF growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 246.06%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.22%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 310.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-9.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 416.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2504.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 296.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
162.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 184.67%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
185.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OGI.TO's 431.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-113.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is at 42.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-168.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is 63.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-153.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO is 39.92%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
9548.01%
Positive growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-27.53%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OGI.TO is at 40.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-56.57%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OGI.TO is at 83.16%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.57%
AR growth well above OGI.TO's 24.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.26%
We show growth while OGI.TO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.91%
Asset growth well under 50% of OGI.TO's 14.97%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-2.10%
We have a declining book value while OGI.TO shows 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-19.58%
We’re deleveraging while OGI.TO stands at 4355.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
271.70%
We increase R&D while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
36.61%
We expand SG&A while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.