1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.93%
Negative revenue growth while OGI.TO stands at 7.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.04%
Negative gross profit growth while OGI.TO is at 41.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-960.92%
Negative EBIT growth while OGI.TO is at 72.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1383.16%
Negative operating income growth while OGI.TO is at 72.24%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-825.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-782.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-500.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
5.01%
Share count expansion well above OGI.TO's 3.77%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above OGI.TO's 0.30%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.85%
OCF growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 188.19%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
50.46%
FCF growth under 50% of OGI.TO's 121.61%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
21610.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 2946.30%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-58.90%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 28.61%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-34.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO stands at 7.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
83.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OGI.TO's 345.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
96.51%
Positive OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
93.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OGI.TO's 232.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-1432.24%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4510.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OGI.TO is 97.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1077.29%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1098.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 390.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-52.70%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-68.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 15.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-0.98%
Inventory is declining while OGI.TO stands at 8.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-18.81%
Negative asset growth while OGI.TO invests at 4.97%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-25.50%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.99%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
41.67%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. OGI.TO's 3.79%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-14.49%
We cut SG&A while OGI.TO invests at 9.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.