1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.84%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 34.84%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
34.84%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 34.84%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
34.95%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 34.95%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
34.48%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 34.48%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
34.48%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 34.48%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.38%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 0.38%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1204.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1204.92%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 70.69%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
70.69%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 70.69%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
70.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 70.69%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
85.51%
Similar net income/share CAGR to TLRY's 85.51%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
85.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 85.51%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
85.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 85.51%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-39.50%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-39.50%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-39.50%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.18%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.36%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.85%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.