PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.05%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 22.05%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
22.05%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 22.05%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
22.04%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 22.04%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
21.74%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 21.74%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
21.74%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 21.74%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.50%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 93.50%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
93.50%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 93.50%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.50%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-102.50%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-102.50%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
73.12%
Similar net income/share CAGR to TLRY's 73.12%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
73.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 73.12%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
73.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 73.12%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-79.29%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-79.29%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-79.29%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.53%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.43%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.04%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 352.04%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.