PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
877.13%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 877.13%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
177.09%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 177.09%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-20.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-20.78%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
83.07%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 83.07%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
83.25%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 83.25%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
83.25%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 83.25%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.59%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 0.59%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.59%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 0.59%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.66%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 54.66%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
39.94%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 39.94%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1466.81%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1466.81%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1466.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-86.27%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-86.27%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-86.27%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
147.79%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 147.79%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
147.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 147.79%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
147.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 147.79%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.22%
AR growth well above TLRY's 76.22%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
92.35%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 92.35%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.72%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.67%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.21%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.