1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.38%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 78.38%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
140.18%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 140.18%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
12.00%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 12.00%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
12.00%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 12.00%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
14.27%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 14.27%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
13.68%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 13.68%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
13.68%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 13.68%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.10%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 38.10%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-23.74%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-428.58%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-428.58%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-428.58%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-115.04%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-115.04%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-115.04%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
123.15%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 123.15%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
123.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 123.15%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
123.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 123.15%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.45%
AR growth well above TLRY's 50.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.96%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 11.96%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-4.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.17%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.27%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.