PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.79%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 13.79%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-55.89%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-110.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-110.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-140.68%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-129.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-128.65%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
40.06%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 40.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
37.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 37.54%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4001.79%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
29.11%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 29.11%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
428.38%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 428.38%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-2160.23%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-519.63%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-44.26%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-325.17%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-1884.91%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-128.25%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4744.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 4744.30%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
5474.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 5474.80%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
1855.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 1855.02%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.62%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
86.58%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 86.58%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
52.33%
Similar asset growth to TLRY's 52.33%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
11.30%
Similar to TLRY's 11.30%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-20.34%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
86.76%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TLRY's 86.76%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
55.94%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 55.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.