1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
242.97%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 242.97%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
191.95%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 191.95%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-318.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-318.21%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-299.52%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-295.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-295.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.15%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 2.15%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.34%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 0.34%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1249.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-27.33%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28238.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 28238.49%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
545.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 545.67%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-187.04%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-89.89%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-395.23%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1405.06%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-592.17%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1081.80%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4146.76%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 4146.76%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
2334.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 2334.22%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
298.88%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 298.88%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.94%
AR growth well above TLRY's 37.94%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
115.87%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 115.87%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.21%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.72%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
41.69%
Debt growth far above TLRY's 41.69%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-63.20%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
90.27%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 90.27%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.