PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.18%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 2.18%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-22.45%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-866.94%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-866.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1775.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1785.39%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1785.39%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
11.26%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 11.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
11.07%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 11.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.83%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 90.83%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
68.66%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 68.66%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4893.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 4893.26%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
1224.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 1224.22%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-1227.10%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
15.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 15.30%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-7393.93%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-5688.60%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-3007.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1597.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5422.95%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 5422.95%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
2128.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 2128.90%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
211.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 211.19%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.46%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
13.05%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 13.05%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-7.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.39%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-17.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-21.64%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.01%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 2.01%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.