PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.79%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 11.79%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-46.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-309.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-309.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2284.85%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2260.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2260.25%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.61%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 0.61%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.61%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 0.61%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.19%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 104.19%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
80.26%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 80.26%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
946.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 946.12%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
538.59%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 538.59%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-84.89%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
65.84%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 65.84%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
261.74%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 261.74%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-5501.82%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4443.43%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-289.78%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3122.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 3122.11%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
403.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 403.50%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-8.22%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.73%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 2.73%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.71%
Similar asset growth to TLRY's 13.71%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
5.38%
Similar to TLRY's 5.38%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
29.90%
Debt growth far above TLRY's 29.90%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
88.66%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TLRY's 88.66%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
18.88%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 18.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.