PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-61.11%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-61.11%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-205.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-181.58%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-181.58%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
9.00%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 9.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 9.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.79%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
65.09%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 65.09%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
998.76%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 998.76%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
70.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 70.17%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
99.10%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 99.10%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-100.92%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
99.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 99.69%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-3992.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-2769.45%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-171.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3001.42%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 3001.42%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
191.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 191.30%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-26.97%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.91%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-0.89%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.70%
Similar asset growth to TLRY's 1.70%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-24.79%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
72.83%
Debt growth far above TLRY's 72.83%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-42.29%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
39.21%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 39.21%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.