PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.13%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 18.13%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
126.49%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 126.49%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
7.01%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 7.01%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
7.01%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 7.01%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
-223.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-151.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-151.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.66%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 0.66%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.66%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 0.66%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1622.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-40695.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
591.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 591.73%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
590.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 590.91%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-9912.68%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1199.97%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-255.95%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-2334.26%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-938.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-207.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
9571.99%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 9571.99%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
979.62%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 979.62%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
63.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 63.77%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.86%
AR growth well above TLRY's 10.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.92%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.65%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.43%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-6.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
119.27%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TLRY's 119.27%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
34.23%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 34.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.