PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.66%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-35.70%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
20.21%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 20.21%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
20.21%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 20.21%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
113.92%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 113.92%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
99.57%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 99.57%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
99.57%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 99.57%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
2.42%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 2.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.42%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 2.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.64%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 81.64%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
77.49%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 77.49%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
594.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 594.48%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
323.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 323.94%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-161.58%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-776.11%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-559.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
284.96%
Similar net income/share CAGR to TLRY's 284.96%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
43.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 43.41%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-93.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5088.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 5088.46%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
710.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 710.77%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
47.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 47.80%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.47%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.35%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.72%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.42%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-8.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-34.39%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-20.17%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.