PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.96%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 0.96%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-116.90%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1962.12%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 1962.12%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
1962.12%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 1962.12%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
-1159.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1118.10%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1118.10%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.74%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 4.74%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 4.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.76%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 55.76%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
48.79%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 48.79%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
773.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 773.51%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-31.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-3473.12%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-20076.82%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
36.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 36.10%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-17455.75%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-5049.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1634.83%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
8676.79%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 8676.79%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
394.53%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 394.53%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
44.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 44.47%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.62%
AR growth well above TLRY's 4.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-10.16%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.35%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.02%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-14.88%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-67.07%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
3.79%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 3.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.