1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.93%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-34.20%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
61.81%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 61.81%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
61.81%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 61.81%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
53.38%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 53.38%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
55.11%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 55.11%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
55.11%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 55.11%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
5.26%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 5.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.26%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 5.26%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-136.34%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-164.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
373.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 373.08%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-43.99%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-41900.71%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
60.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 60.67%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
89.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 89.54%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-3781.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-193.75%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-402.19%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5906.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 5906.98%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-16.70%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-14.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.81%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
15.72%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 15.72%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.21%
Similar asset growth to TLRY's 2.21%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-2.95%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-4.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-56.11%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-13.48%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.