PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.51%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 9.51%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
7.27%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 7.27%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-21.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
12.27%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 12.27%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
16.96%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 16.96%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
16.96%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 16.96%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
5.73%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 5.73%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 5.73%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-81.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
233.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 233.46%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-47.78%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-1691.31%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-637.63%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-556.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-5853.83%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-133.36%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
82.42%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 82.42%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
5683.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 5683.87%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-29.32%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-23.00%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.38%
AR growth well above TLRY's 10.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.89%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 8.89%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.63%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.64%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-29.11%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.54%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 7.54%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.