PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.80%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-41.28%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
20.03%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 20.03%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
20.03%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 20.03%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
-89.15%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-78.84%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-78.84%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
3.24%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 3.24%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.24%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 3.24%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.13%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 47.13%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
28.93%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 28.93%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.49%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-45.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-449.35%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
71.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 71.41%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-9039.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-781.73%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
68.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 68.70%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
88.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 88.49%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
7068.67%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 7068.67%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-27.08%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-0.15%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.16%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.72%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.57%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.02%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
89.29%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TLRY's 89.29%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.66%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 1.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.