PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.06%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 22.06%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
127.38%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 127.38%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
38.32%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 38.32%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
38.32%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 38.32%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
65.75%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 65.75%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
66.67%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 66.67%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
66.67%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 66.67%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
5.20%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 5.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.20%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 5.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
293.60%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 293.60%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
184.22%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 184.22%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.22%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-9.09%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2504.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 2504.48%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
162.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 162.10%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
185.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 185.89%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-113.65%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-168.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-153.14%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
9548.01%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 9548.01%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-27.53%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-56.57%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.57%
AR growth well above TLRY's 13.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.26%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 3.26%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.91%
Similar asset growth to TLRY's 2.91%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-2.10%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-19.58%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
271.70%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TLRY's 271.70%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
36.61%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 36.61%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.