1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.98%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.67%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-77.54%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-77.54%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-23.37%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-11.75%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
10.30%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 10.30%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.30%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 10.30%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-213.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-293.67%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.02%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-38.88%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-73.69%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
63.22%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 63.22%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
80.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 80.56%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-1805.63%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-176.55%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
51.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 51.73%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
9259.09%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 9259.09%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-35.28%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-58.67%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.30%
AR growth well above TLRY's 2.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.84%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 4.84%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.69%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.28%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.29%
Debt growth far above TLRY's 0.29%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-73.35%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-19.29%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.