PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.45%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 5.45%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
2.54%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 2.54%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-215.47%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.44%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-117.73%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-120.58%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-123.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.20%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.34%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
3.14%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 3.14%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.07%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-27.65%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-3018.29%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
67.43%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 67.43%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-26.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-5286.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-248.74%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-882.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
10337.78%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 10337.78%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-34.81%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-58.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.36%
AR growth well above TLRY's 8.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.65%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 0.65%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.65%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.34%
Similar to TLRY's 0.34%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-3.77%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-42.86%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.77%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.