PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.93%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-15.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-960.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1383.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-825.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-782.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-500.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
5.01%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 5.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 5.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.85%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 85.85%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
50.46%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 50.46%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
21610.35%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to TLRY's 21610.35%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
-58.90%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-34.59%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
83.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 83.84%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
96.51%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 96.51%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
93.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 93.36%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-1432.24%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4510.94%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1077.29%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1098.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 1098.12%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-52.70%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-68.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-0.98%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-18.81%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-25.50%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.99%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
41.67%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TLRY's 41.67%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-14.49%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.