PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.86%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 20.86%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
30.04%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 30.04%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-72.06%
Negative EBIT growth while TLRY is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-130.61%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-61.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while TLRY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while TLRY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-100.00%
Share reduction while TLRY is at 7.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-100.00%
Reduced diluted shares while TLRY is at 7.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.31%
Negative OCF growth while TLRY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-232.20%
Negative FCF growth while TLRY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while TLRY stands at 2408.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while TLRY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while TLRY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while TLRY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
100.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while TLRY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
100.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while TLRY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
100.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while TLRY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-100.00%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while TLRY stands at 533.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-100.00%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-100.00%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.53%
AR growth well above TLRY's 17.53%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.84%
Inventory growth well above TLRY's 2.84%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-39.05%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-4.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-60.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
12.05%
We expand SG&A while TLRY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.