PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.07%
Positive EBIT growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
66.07%
Positive operating income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
71.07%
Positive net income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
71.05%
Positive EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
71.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.38%
Share reduction while WEED.TO is at 96.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.38%
Reduced diluted shares while WEED.TO is at 96.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.07%
Positive OCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
46.07%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-264.77%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-264.77%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-264.77%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
78.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
78.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
78.58%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-13.10%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 2476.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-13.10%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 2476.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-13.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 967.98%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.75%
Firm’s AR is declining while WEED.TO shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.84%
Negative asset growth while WEED.TO invests at 3018.58%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.56%
We have a declining book value while WEED.TO shows 1188.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.07%
We cut SG&A while WEED.TO invests at 4651.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.